POULSBO — “The dog ate my ballot.”
That’s one of the more unusual Election Day excuses for needing a new ballot that election workers have heard at the polling place at the Poulsbo Fire Department headquarters station on Highway 305 and Liberty Road.
“We’ve heard it all,” poll worker Susan Addy said Feb. 13.
But that’s what Addy and her fellow poll workers — Bert Johnson, Hazel Simpson and Brian Stengele — were there for early Election Day: to help ensure residents can exercise their right to vote.
At stake today in Bremerton and North Kitsap school districts: property tax levies to support educational programs, school operations and maintenance, and technology purchases, upgrades and maintenance.
Ballots must be postmarked today, or deposited into a ballot drop box by 8 p.m.
Ballot drop boxes in Bremerton/Central Kitsap are located at the Central Kitsap School District Administration Building, 9210 Silverdale Way NW, Silverdale; Bremerton Elks Lodge 1181, 4131 Pine Road NE, Bremerton; Kitsap Regional Library, 1301 Sylvan Way, Bremerton; and West Side Improvement Club, 4109 West E St., Bremerton.
Ballot drop boxes in North Kitsap are located at Norwegian Point Park, 38950 Hansville Road NE, Hansville; Village Green Park, 10810 NE West Kingston Road, Kingston; North Kitsap Fire & Rescue, 26642 Miller Bay Road NE, Kingston; Poulsbo Fire Station, 911 NE Liberty Road, Poulsbo; and the Suquamish Tribal Council Building, 18490 Suquamish Way NE, Suquamish.
Each proposition on the ballot requires a simple majority to pass. Early Election Day, it looked as if a relatively small number of voters would decide the measures. Of 57,523 ballots mailed to voters in the North Kitsap and Bremerton school districts, 30.90 percent of North Kitsap voters had returned their ballots as of Feb. 12; in Bremerton, the turnout was 23.26 percent.
While the Poulsbo polling station was empty, save for the poll workers, at 9:30 a.m., Stengele said four or five cars pulled up to the ballot drop box outside when he arrvived at 6:30 a.m., and he’s been able to hear cars pulling up to the drop box all morning.
Bremerton’s tax levies
Proposition No. 1, School Support Levy, would replace an expiring property tax levy for “essential educational operating and maintenance expenses not funded by the State,” according to the measure. The levy, $1.50 per $1,000 of assessed property valuation, would generate $6.6 million in 2019 and $8.6 million in 2020.
Prop. 1 would help support “employee costs (salaries), instructional materials, special programs, activities and sports, technology systems operation, transportation costs, maintenance of facilities and other non-capital expenses of operating the District schools.”
This tax levy maintains educational programs and operations that are not funded by the state, proponents Julie Wasserburger and Jonee Dubos wrote in the voter guide.
“The levy amount in this request is less than previous years,” they wrote. Ditto in North Kitsap School District, which has similar measures on the Feb. 13 ballot. The reason the local levy amounts are lower, according to officials there: The state Legislature established a property tax to help it meet its requirements to fund basic education under the McCleary decision. But to limit the tax burden on property owners, the Legislature limited the amount school districts can now levy. “It’s a one-for-one wash,” said Dr. Laurynn Evans, North Kitsap superintendent.
Bremerton’s Prop. 1 will provide 7 to 8 percent of the district’s revenues, Wasserburger and Dubos wrote.
“The funding will help to support specialty programs such as STEM, Dual Language, Art Integration and summer school. It will also add current materials to our school libraries that support student academic research and personal interest needs. Extra-curricular programs such as music, drama, sports and other clubs will also continue to function. In addition, funding will help to attract and retain qualified staff needed to teach specialized classes and positions not funded by the state, including school security personnel and a School Resource Officer.
“Funding will also support assistance for students with special needs. All of these program, staffing and operation needs work together in creating a system that educates Bremerton’s diverse population of children.”
Prop. 2, Technology and Capital Projects, would levy a tax rate of 67 cents per $1,000 of assessed valuation in 2019, raising $2.4 million “for hardware, online applications, improved infrastructure, professional development, and services related to installing and integrating the systems,” Wasserburger and Dubos wrote.
“The outcome will be improved student learning with reliable and current hardware, modernized infrastructure, equitable access for all students, and professional development for staff on integrating technology into classroom instruction.”
There were no arguments in opposition to either proposition filed.
North Kitsap’s tax levies
Proposition 1, Educational Program & Operations Funding Levy, would continue an expiring tax levy to provide funding for instructional programs “beyond the state minimum instructional offerings,” and maintain student/staffing ratios, and programs.
The levy, $1.50 per $1,000 of assessed property valuation, would generate $11.4 million in 2019, $11.9 million in 2020, $12.5 million in 2021, and $13.2 million in 2022.
Proposition 2, Facilities and Technology Capital Projects Levy, would replace a construction bond that is expiring and would fund “construction, modernization and remodeling of existing facilities to improve the health, comfort, safety, security, facility infrastructure and class size requirements, as well as improving technology equipment and technology infrastructure.”
The levy, $1.26 per $1,000 of assessed property valuation, would generate $9.2 million in 2019, $9.7 million in 2020; $10.2 million in 2021, and $10.7 million in 2022.
Rejection of Prop. 1, according to the statement prepared by the district’s attorney, “would result in increased class sizes, reductions in special education services, decreased paraeducator support for teacher and students, reduced maintenance, grounds, and custodial support for the district’s 231.56 acres of school grounds and playfields and 1 million square feet of facilities, increased bus ride times, and elimination of extra-curricular activities.”
If voters reject Prop. 2, the district “would incur increased maintenance and operational costs to service and operate obsolete or aging facility, utilities, and technology infrastructure systems, and incur risks and costs of legal noncompliance with state mandates to reduce class sizes.”
Kim Gerlach, a licensed electrician and former school district maintenance employee, said she supports local tax funding for schools, but questions how the district spends those tax dollars. She cites a faulty alarm system that has required after-hour and holiday response by a maintenance worker, resulting in overtime costs; work by contractors that had to be re-done; and roofs at Gordon and Vinland elementary schools that need to be replaced four or five years after they were last re-roofed.
“There is an amazing amount of wasted dollars in NKSD,” Gerlach wrote in the voter guide. “The superintendent and board need to become fiscally responsible. Needed supplies and programs could be better afforded if the waste was cut.”
District finance director Jason Rhodes said skylights should have been replaced when Gordon and Vinland were last re-roofed. Turned out, those skylights leaked. “We have taken those skylights out of service and roofed over it,” Rhodes said.
He said some work had to be re-done because the equipment being fixed — such as a 40-year-old HVAC heat exchanger at Poulasbo Elementary —was old and needed to be replaced.
Evans, who became North Kitsap’s superintendent this school year, said the alarm system is goofy — an employee who has a key to the building may not have a key to the office where the keypad is located. She said switching from a key-and-code system to key fob security system will fix it and will reduce costs. Keys don’t need to be replaced; the fob can be reprogrammed. The new system will enable a school to automatically lock down.
Evans said two changes are taking place: one, a “proper” facilities assessment is being established so issues like those skylights are brought to light. Two, the district will publicly report on its project management and completion, so the public has a scorecard on “what we’re doing and where we’re going.”
“One of the things we did is put a priority on meeting the needs of our schools,” she said. “We want to be respectful of our taxpayers. I’ve shared with people that my husband and I bought our house here before I knew this job was available. It was a stretch for us, and I’m not interested in getting taxed out of my home any more than anyone else.”
Of the tax levies on the Feb. 13 ballot, she said, “It’s a big ask. But it’s an important one.”